News

How to Optimize Fulfillment for Peak-Season Omnichannel Orders

BY CSA STAFF

By Mike Gregory, Kurt Salmon

As consumers busy themselves with spring gardening and plans for summer travel, their favorite retailers are already planning for back-to-school and the 2014 holiday season. And after delivery delays during holiday 2013 left many customers fuming, a core issue for retailers is how to optimize their peak-season order fulfillment and related customer service.

Omnichannel is both the challenge and the solution, consulting firm Kurt Salmon concluded after partnering with StellaService to analyze retailers’ peak-season shipping, fulfillment and refund processes. For while the seamless integration of sales channels has raised consumer expectations around the ordering and delivery of product, it’s also requiring that retailers’ step-up their integration of systems and processes in order to meet those expectations. In fact, as our analysis revealed that a number of peak-season omnichannel fulfillment best practices have already emerged.

Peak Season Top Performers
We reviewed orders containing multiple items from more than 70 retailers placed on Cyber Monday, the biggest online shopping day of the year, and then ranked the retailers based on their average delivery times (the number of days elapsed between placing and receiving an order). The top performers, including Under Armour, Brooks Brothers and Office Depot, averaged 1.6 delivery days for multi-unit orders. The average delivery time across all retailers examined in the study during peak season (between Black Friday and Christmas), however, was nine days.

After online sales outpaced in-store purchases over Thanksgiving weekend the year before, the top performers during Holiday 2013 made a point of adjusting their forecasts to prioritize resources and prepare for the influx to begin on Black Friday.

They did more than just fulfill orders quickly, however; top performers also emphasized free shipping and presentation. Notably, while many retailers tout free shipping for a limited time or once orders reach a certain price threshold, retailers including Zappos, Net-A-Porter — and, more recently, Neiman Marcus — offer it as a feature for all online orders. Giving a human touch to orders, such as with Zappos’ handwritten thank you notes, was another standout feature. This is especially important in light of omnichannel customers’ expectation that online customer service match in-store standards.

And, since the customer experience isn’t over once the product is delivered, we tested and reviewed the speed and related processes of post-holiday refunds as well. Among the 50 retailers we looked at, the best-in-class streamlined processes in three key areas: keeping it simple for consumers by including prepaid return shipping labels with all orders, reducing transportation obstacles by limiting the number of carriers who touch the process, strategically locating returns processing centers, and implementing systems and software to swiftly process both the financial transaction and move the merchandise back into circulation or out of stock.

Peak Season Pitfalls
A staggering 38% of orders in our analysis originated from two or more shipping points. Moreover, 42% of multi-unit orders arrived in multiple packages that originated from a single distribution center.

Such inefficiencies point to outdated inventory systems unable to keep up with consumer shopping habits. An efficient inventory system comprehensively tracks the availability of stock at both store locations and distribution centers, and it can nimbly identify those locations that can ship all units in a single order at the same time — whether it’s a store or a warehouse. After all, when retailers fulfill orders through multiple fulfillment locations or through multiple packages, shipping costs can double or triple, and those increases can’t be passed along to the customer.

In addition to identifying fulfillment inefficiencies, our analysis sought to uncover the causes of the last-minute shipping delays that made headlines at Christmastime. Indeed, we analyzed more than 175 online orders placed on the last day that retailers guaranteed delivery by Christmas, and 15% of those orders failed to reach their destinations in time.

But while major carriers like UPS and FedEx were accused of being ill-prepared for high volume and poor weather, we found that retailers were actually responsible for a majority (56%) of delays. The most frequently cited issue was failure by the retailer to upgrade an order’s shipping status (40%). For example, one retailer processed a ship-from-store order on December 19 for standard ground shipping, but the shipment was going from California to Connecticut, and the store staff failed to ensure that the shipping method would guarantee on-time delivery.

Preparing for the Next Peak Season: What Can You Do Now?
It’s never too early to begin planning for the peak holiday season. Many retailers have or are in the process of conducting a thorough review of their shipping strategies to determine what worked and what didn’t, and where there’s room for improvement.

For some retailers, a review starts with revisiting carrier agreements. The best way to get product to customers may involve contracts with multiple carriers, or exploring additional delivery options beyond traditional ground shipping with an exclusive carrier. To ensure a successful holiday season, retailers should be testing their fulfillment process by the third quarter, which means now is the time to have conversations with carriers about shipping options and the most efficient delivery model.

Such testing is especially important for retailers that are piloting ship-from-store programs, which can be very effective in reducing delivery times but can require specific agreements with carriers in order to be successful — agreements that may look very different from those designed for distribution centers. In the meantime, implementing effective inventory management software and processes are critical for in-store employees to fulfill online orders as effectively as their distribution center counterparts, as well as maintaining consistency in packaging, brand and quality of service across channels.

Better forecasting and a close look at omnichannel strategy before the next peak season will also be crucial for retailers. More consumers than ever are going online to do their holiday shopping, and as the 2013 season made clear, many wait until the last minute to place their orders. Retailers, then, need to adjust their peak-season forecasts accordingly. They must also make sure that their promotional plans are aligned across all departments, and are flexible enough to account for near-real-time demand and capacity signals.

The promise of omnichannel — a seamless retail experience regardless of the channel — has lifted the order and delivery expectations of customers higher than ever before, especially during peak season. By putting in place the appropriate systems and processes, however, and planning for peak-season increases in demand well in advance, retailers can not only deliver on the omnichannel promise, but reap the rewards.

Mike Gregory is a partner and director of the Supply Chain practice at Kurt Salmon. He can be reached at [email protected].


More Web Exclusives/Guest Commentaries

keyboard_arrow_downCOMMENTS

Leave a Reply

A.Boon says:
May-01-2014 01:07 pm

Warehouse inventory control strategies
Interesting article. Omnichannel strategies allow retailers to engage with a consumer through all channels, new strategies will help retailers manage their products and ensure timely delivery. I work for McGladrey and there's a very informative whitepaper on our website that readers of this article will be interested in. @ Count, manage and move: Warehouse inventory control strategies http://bit.ly/1kgYXWo

A.Boon says:
May-01-2014 01:07 pm

Interesting article. Omnichannel strategies allow retailers to engage with a consumer through all channels, new strategies will help retailers manage their products and ensure timely delivery. I work for McGladrey and there's a very informative whitepaper on our website that readers of this article will be interested in. @ Count, manage and move: Warehouse inventory control strategies http://bit.ly/1kgYXWo

Polls

Consumer confidence is high. Is that reflected in your stores’ revenues?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
FINANCE

Taxes result in Q1 net loss for EBay

BY Dan Berthiaume

San Jose, Calif. – A $3 billion tax charge on foreign profits resulted in EBay Inc. reporting a net loss of $2.33 billion for the first quarter of fiscal 2013, compared to net earnings of $677 million in the first quarter of the previous fiscal year. Analysts had expected EBay to report net earnings for the quarter, although EBay paid the tax charge in the process of making about $6 billion in offshore cash available.

Dynamic growth in EBay’s PayPal business helped drive a 14% increase in revenue, to $4.26 billion from $3.75 billion, beating analyst expectations of $4.23 billion. During the second quarter of fiscal 2014, EBay expects net revenues of $4.32-$4.42 billion, and net revenues of $18-$18.5 billion in the full fiscal year.

“We delivered a strong first quarter, with enabled commerce volume up 24% and revenue up 14%,” said eBay Inc. president and CEO John Donahoe. “We are committed to delivering sustainable shareholder value and focusing on what matters most to our investors. We are executing our growth plans, capitalizing on the synergies in our portfolio and aggressively executing our $5.0 billion share buyback program. Today, we also announced a non-cash tax charge to facilitate repatriation of $6 billion net in foreign earnings, increasing our available U.S. cash and enhancing our financial flexibility."

keyboard_arrow_downCOMMENTS

Leave a Reply

No comments found

Polls

Consumer confidence is high. Is that reflected in your stores’ revenues?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
FINANCE

E-commerce costs, firearms hit Big 5 in Q1; 12-15 new stores on tap

BY Dan Berthiaume

El Segundo, Calif. – Big 5 Sporting Goods experienced a 72% drop in net income during the first quarter of fiscal 2014, to $2.1 million from $7.5 million in the first quarter of the prior fiscal year. Expenses associated with the retailer’s new e-commerce platform affected its net income.

Big 5 expects to open a net of 12-15 new stores during fiscal 2014, including two in the second quarter. Meanwhile, net sales declined 6% to $231.3 million from $246.3 million and same-store sales shrank 7.9%. Big 5 cited declining sales in firearms and ammunition, as well as unusually mild winter weather in Western states, as hurting sales during the quarter.

For the fiscal 2014 second quarter, the company expects same store sales comparisons in the low negative to low positive single-digit range and earnings per diluted share in the range of $0.12 to $0.20. This guidance reflects the continued softness in demand for firearms, ammunition and related products and the negative effect of the calendar shift of the Easter holiday, during which Big 5 stores are closed, out of the first quarter and into the second quarter this year.

"As expected, our first quarter results declined when compared to a very strong performance during the prior year, due largely to substantially reduced demand for firearms and ammunition products and soft sales of winter products resulting from warm and dry conditions in most of our western markets throughout the winter season," said Steven G. Miller, chairman, president and CEO. "We were encouraged by the strength of our non-firearm and non-winter-related product categories during the quarter. We feel well positioned from a merchandise and promotional perspective for the key selling period during the quarter, which includes Memorial Day, Father’s Day and the start of the summer season."

keyboard_arrow_downCOMMENTS

Leave a Reply

No comments found

Polls

Consumer confidence is high. Is that reflected in your stores’ revenues?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...