OPERATIONS

NRF: New regulations threaten ability of women to obtain credit

BY Marianne Wilson

Washington, D.C. — Federal regulations enacted last year potentially undermine a generation-old law guaranteeing women the right to obtain credit in their own names and need to be reconsidered, the National Retail Federation told a congressional committee on Wednesday.

“For many years, spouses – primarily women – could not get credit in their own names. Credit granters required a woman to have the signature of the ‘breadwinner’ before she could obtain credit, and credit was treated as if it belonged solely to the husband,” NRF senior VP and general counsel Mallory Duncan said. “Retailers would be very disappointed if this rule even inadvertently began to return us to those days of inequity.”

The House Financial Services Committee is scheduled to hold a hearing this afternoon on a provision of the 2009 Card Act credit card reform law requiring retailers and other card issuers to consider applicants’ ability to pay when issuing cards or granting credit increases. As written by Congress, the law requires that applicants under the age of 21 be asked to disclose their individual income rather than household income. The move was intended to help keep young people from becoming saddled with debt from cards they could not afford. But Federal Reserve regulations implementing the law in 2011 applied the requirement to all card applicants regardless of age.

Under the regulations, a stay-at-home spouse with no income of his or her own would effectively be unable to obtain credit or an increase in a credit limit without having the application signed by the income-earning spouse. In written testimony submitted for the hearing, NRF said that could be particularly difficult for individuals who are widowed, divorced or in an abusive relationship, or whose spouse is in the military and deployed overseas for extended periods. The Fed’s suggestion that they open joint accounts or become an authorized user on a spouse’s account “ignores the vital role these women play in their households.”


NRF has fought the income requirement as an example of the federal regulatory process gone awry, and believes the rules could undermine the Equal Credit Opportunity Act, a 1974 law giving women the right to obtain credit in their own name.

“The Federal Reserve rule has placed stay-at-home spouses in the untenable position of either lying about their independent income…or potentially being embarrassed in front of other customers when they are declined,” NRF said in its testimony. “The embarrassment of customers in stores is not good for customers, store employees or brands’ reputations.”

NRF urged that the newly formed Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, which now has jurisdiction over credit laws, revise the income requirement to reflect the intention of Congress that they be limited to card applicants under 21.

keyboard_arrow_downCOMMENTS

Leave a Reply

No comments found

Polls

Consumer confidence is high. Is that reflected in your stores’ revenues?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
OPERATIONS

Law firm launches ADA Title III blog

BY Marianne Wilson

Washington, D.C. – Law firm Seyfarth Shaw LLP has launched a blog about the Americans With Disabilities Act. The blog, called the ADA Title III News & Insights Blog (Adatitleiii.com), is designed as an accessibility law resource for any business that opens its doors to the public.

Title III regulations have been prominent issues over the past year, according to the firm. One important development was the Justice Department’s issuance of new regulations under ADA Titles II and III requiring public accommodations and state and local governments to retrofit their existing pools and spas to include a pool lift or ramp entry.

The new blog is designed to serve as an accessibility law resource providing information for businesses falling under the ADA’s regulatory purview – including hotels, shopping centers, healthcare providers, restaurants and private educational institutions, among others. It contains links to resources and tools to help businesses better understand and comply with their legal obligations.

keyboard_arrow_downCOMMENTS

Leave a Reply

P.Banik says:
Mar-13-2013 09:18 am

Such a blog would be a
Such a blog would be a helpful for people who look for guidance on this issue. Thanks to the presence of the online law directories it is easier to find out about the lawyers and law firms. My friend in San Francisco was looking for a good divorce lawyer, and she found a good san francisco divorce lawyer online.

P.Banik says:
Mar-13-2013 09:18 am

Such a blog would be a helpful for people who look for guidance on this issue. Thanks to the presence of the online law directories it is easier to find out about the lawyers and law firms. My friend in San Francisco was looking for a good divorce lawyer, and she found a good san francisco divorce lawyer online.

Polls

Consumer confidence is high. Is that reflected in your stores’ revenues?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
FINANCE

Kenneth Cole will take his namesake company private in $245 million deal

BY Staff Writer

New York — Kenneth Cole Productions said its board has approved founder Kenneth Cole’s offer to buy up the remaining part of the company that he doesn’t already own in a deal worth $245 million.

Cole, currently the chairman and CEO of Kenneth Cole, holds about 46% of its outstanding common stock and controls 89% of its voting power. He will pay $15.25 for each share of the company that he doesn’t already own.

Cole in February offered to pay $15 a share for the company, saying that private ownership was in the best interests of the company given recent market challenges and a competitive retail landscape. Major company shareholder Bandera Partners LLC last month called the $15 offer too low.

keyboard_arrow_downCOMMENTS

Leave a Reply

No comments found

Polls

Consumer confidence is high. Is that reflected in your stores’ revenues?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...