STORE SPACES

Regency Centers expands energy-saving initiatives with networked lighting controls

BY Staff Writer

Jacksonville, Fla. — Regency Centers has reduced its energy consumption since 2010 by 3.4 million kilowatt-hours. The installation of networked lighting controls at 48 shopping centers, combined with the use of LED lighting and more efficient HID lamps, accounts for the majority of these savings.

“The networked lighting controls currently generate about $400,000 in annual expense savings,” said Scott Prigge, senior VP national operations for Regency Centers. “Next year, we are on track to increase these savings by 55%, reducing our operating expenses by an additional $220,000. These savings have an immediate and impactful benefit to our bottom line, while also driving more competitive triple net expenses for our tenants.”

Currently, Regency has networked lighting controls installed at 48 neighborhood and community centers. It plans to add the lighting control systems to approximately 30 properties in the next six months to 12 months and will incrementally adopt the technology in its remaining portfolio where the investment makes sound financial sense.

“The payback period for the networked lighting controls is extremely attractive; typically one to three years, depending on the unique circumstances at each property,” said Mark Peternell, VP sustainability for Regency. “And this does not take into consideration the additional maintenance savings derived from extending the life of the fixtures, which are no longer burning all night long.”

keyboard_arrow_downCOMMENTS

Leave a Reply

M.Fourcall says:
Nov-24-2012 03:44 am

I have been reading in a
I have been reading in a class and we are looking at this subject in the next week. I will be assign my student to look at your post for good information. Toronto SEO

M.Fourcall says:
Nov-24-2012 03:44 am

I have been reading in a class and we are looking at this subject in the next week. I will be assign my student to look at your post for good information. Toronto SEO

Polls

Consumer confidence is high. Is that reflected in your stores’ revenues?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
News

Shopping guide to made-in-USA products released

BY CSA STAFF

LOS ANGELES — With the holiday shopping season approaching, one group has released a guide to goods produced domestically.

The Made in USA Foundation announced the latest edition of the "All-American Holiday Gift Guide," which shows readers how to buy American-made Christmas and Hannukah gifts, ornaments and cards, with sections on toys, jewelry, games and other items for men, women and children. Co-published with Made in USA Certified, the 115-page guide also includes food-related items, such as chocolates, blenders and stoves.

"Companies are coming back to the United States," Made in USA Foundation chairman Joel Joseph said. "Consumers are demanding American-made products, and U.S. companies are more competitive than ever in making high-quality consumer goods."

The guide is available on the foundation’s website and Amazon.com for $9.95 as a paperback or $2.99 as an electronic book.

keyboard_arrow_downCOMMENTS

Leave a Reply

No comments found

Polls

Consumer confidence is high. Is that reflected in your stores’ revenues?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
News

Ralphs Grocery v. UFCW

BY CSA STAFF

By John H. Douglas, [email protected]

On Oct. 3, 2012, the California Supreme Court held oral argument in Ralphs Grocery Company v. United Food and Commercial Workers’ Union Local 8. A decision – which under Court rules should generally issue within 90 days – may well decide the fate of the so-called “Moscone Act” – a law passed by the California legislature in 1975 that limits the jurisdiction of state courts to issue injunctions in cases involving “labor disputes.”

Though the legal issues in the case are rather complex, at its core, the case presents the following issue – is it constitutional for a legislature to discriminate among different subjects of speech by law?

The “Moscone Act” divests state courts of jurisdiction to issue injunctions forbidding “any person or persons, whether singly or in concert,” from “giving publicity to, and obtaining or communicating information regarding the existence of, or the facts involved in, any labor dispute, whether by advertising, speaking, patrolling any public street or any place where any person or persons may lawfully be, or by any other method not involving fraud, violence or breach of the peace.”

Police Dept. of City of Chicago v. Mosley – a unanimous 1972 United States Supreme Court decision authored by Thurgood Marshall – had invalidated as unconstitutional a Chicago ordinance that prohibited picketing or demonstrations within 150 ft. of any primary or secondary school building unless what was involved was “peaceful picketing of any school involved in a labor dispute.” In deciding to invalidate the ordinance, Justice Marshall reasoned: “The central problem with Chicago’s ordinance is that it describes permissible picketing in terms of its subject matter. Peaceful picketing on the subject of a school’s labor-management dispute is permitted, but all other peaceful picketing is prohibited. The operative distinction is the message on a picket sign. But, above all else, the First Amendment means that government has no power to restrict expression because of its message, its ideas, its subject matter, or its content.”

Relying on Mosley, in 2004, the Court just below the United States Supreme Court – the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit – found in a case called Waremart Foods v. NLRB that the Moscone Act impermissibly favored labor-related speech based on its content and thus violated of the First and Fourteenth Amendments to the U.S. Constitution. Though undoubtedly a decision of a highly influential court with jurisdiction in certain administrative appeals involving federal agencies such as the National Labor Relations Board, the Court of the Appeal of the District Columbia does not have general jurisdiction in California. As such, its observations about the unconstitutionality of the Moscone Act were (and are) not binding on California state – or even federal courts for that matter. Nonetheless, since Waremart, it is safe to say that the Moscone Act has basically been hanging by a legal “thread.”

Putting on a brave face, unions in California have continued to point to the various exemptions and exceptions for “labor disputes” within otherwise generally applicable trespass (and other) statutes when local police are called to scenes of picketing or protest on private property. Their implicit threat has been that if arrested, the police will be sued for false arrest and civil rights violations. This threat alone has often been enough to dissuade (particularly more union-friendly) California District Attorneys and police from proceeding with arrests and/or prosecutions except in the most egregious of circumstances.

Fast forward to July 25, 2007, and the opening of a new – and non-union – Foods Co. store in a Sacramento shopping area called “College Square.” In response, eight to ten agents of UFCW Local 8 began a five-day-a-week picket at the front entrance of the food retailer – the entire time on the retailer’s property – urging a boycott of the business due to its non-union status.

At first Foods Co. tried to mollify the union – and asked that it simply respect certain rules that it was willing to apply to anyone engaged in “free speech” on its premises – (even though the California Supreme Court’s “Pruneyard” doctrine – which creates a general free speech right in sufficiently large shopping malls that are the modern-day equivalent of public squares – almost certainly did not even apply to the comparatively modest College Square facility.) The union, however, declined to adhere to such rules.

Eventually, on April 15, 2008 – four years after the Waremart decision – Ralphs sought an injunction in Sacramento Superior Court – arguing, among other things, that the Moscone Act was unconstitutional and thus, should not prevent the Court from issuing an injunction. Although the trial Court agreed with Ralphs that the Moscone Act was unconstitutional, the trial court declined to find that a separate statute (Labor Code section 1138.1 – which sets up special procedural requirements for injunction hearings involving labor disputes) was – and then found that Ralphs had not satisfied its requirements. As such, it denied Ralphs the injunction it sought.

Ralphs appealed. Some two years later, on July 19, 2010, the California Court of Appeal issued a decision agreeing with the trial court that the Moscone Act was unconstitutional, but also finding (unlike the trial court) that Labor Code section 1138.1 was as well. In addition, after finding that College Square was not a “public forum” within the meaning of Pruneyard, the Court of Appeal reversed and remanded the matter to the trial court with instructions to grant the requested injunction.

This time, the union appealed – to the California Supreme Court.

The case is now fully briefed and argued. If it does not figure out a creative way to avoid the question – which it may try to do – in the very near future, the California Supreme Court should decide, like the California Court of Appeal – whether the Moscone Act and California Labor Code section 1138.1 are constitutional.

If the California Supreme Court reaches the same conclusion as the California Court of Appeal and the United States Court of Appeal for the District of Columbia Circuit on the issue – one thing is certain. Life will become much easier for freestanding or strip mall retailers that seek for one reason or another to keep labor protestors or pickets away from their front doors and out of their leased or own parking lots in California. If the Court tries to dodge the question – or finds in favor of the union – what will happen is hard to predict. Ralphs might very well try to appeal to the United States Supreme Court in such a circumstance.

In any event, the “balance of power” between unions and employers in California will likely be significantly affected one way or another depending on the outcome of the Ralphs case. Developments in the case bear close attention.

John H. Douglas is a management side labor lawyer practicing in the San Francisco office of Foley & Lardner LLP, a 900-lawyer law firm founded in Wisconsin in 1842. He can be reached at [email protected].


More Web Exclusives/Guest Commentaries

keyboard_arrow_downCOMMENTS

Leave a Reply

J.Mancao says:
Dec-11-2013 08:47 am

This would surely cause great
This would surely cause great impact to the public. Looking forward for further discussion of this issue. Thumbs up :) http://www.dreamscapemarketingstudios.com http://www.dukembamarketingclub.com

J.Mancao says:
Dec-11-2013 08:47 am

This would surely cause great impact to the public. Looking forward for further discussion of this issue. Thumbs up :) http://www.dreamscapemarketingstudios.com http://www.dukembamarketingclub.com

duyentran607 says:
Apr-20-2013 10:55 pm

ChatRandom
In any event, the “balance of power” between unions and employers in California will likely be significantly affected one way or another depending on the outcome of the Ralphs case. Developments in the case bear close attention.ChatRandom

J.Walker says:
Apr-14-2013 12:06 pm

If the Court tries to dodge
If the Court tries to dodge the question – or finds in favor of the union – what will happen is hard to predict. Ralphs might very well try to appeal to the United States Supreme Court in such a circumstance. superiorpapers.net

J.Walker says:
Apr-14-2013 12:06 pm

If the Court tries to dodge the question – or finds in favor of the union – what will happen is hard to predict. Ralphs might very well try to appeal to the United States Supreme Court in such a circumstance. superiorpapers.net

P.Lopez says:
Apr-09-2013 05:54 pm

chatrandom
Though undoubtedly a decision of a highly influential court with jurisdiction in certain administrative appeals involving federal agencies such as the National Labor Relations Board. chatrandom

J.Lavoro says:
Apr-09-2013 03:49 pm

I am looking forward to
I am looking forward to reading new articles. Keep up the good work! Awesome blog. I enjoyed reading This is truly a great read for me. I have bookmarked it. ads dating

P.Lopez says:
Apr-09-2013 05:54 pm

Though undoubtedly a decision of a highly influential court with jurisdiction in certain administrative appeals involving federal agencies such as the National Labor Relations Board. chatrandom

J.Lavoro says:
Apr-09-2013 03:49 pm

I am looking forward to reading new articles. Keep up the good work! Awesome blog. I enjoyed reading This is truly a great read for me. I have bookmarked it. ads dating

D.Khatri says:
Mar-25-2013 07:22 pm

We will travel to South
We will travel to South Africa the next year, she loves adventures and this is the perfect opportunity for an written essay papers trip in the Savanna.

D.Khatri says:
Mar-25-2013 07:22 pm

We will travel to South Africa the next year, she loves adventures and this is the perfect opportunity for an written essay papers trip in the Savanna.

D.Khatri says:
Feb-26-2013 11:07 pm

The function the brand name
The function the brand name performs in driving customer variety and brand name energy, or the ability of buy youtube views the manufacturer to protected the shipping of expected foreseeable future earnings.

D.Khatri says:
Feb-26-2013 11:07 pm

The function the brand name performs in driving customer variety and brand name energy, or the ability of buy youtube views the manufacturer to protected the shipping of expected foreseeable future earnings.

L.Cury says:
Feb-18-2013 06:12 am

objectives
this is a very lengthy and hot top worthy of discussion. i think we should analyze all these carefully before giving our thoughts as it involves critical thinking. buy uk facebook fans

L.Cury says:
Feb-18-2013 06:12 am

this is a very lengthy and hot top worthy of discussion. i think we should analyze all these carefully before giving our thoughts as it involves critical thinking. buy uk facebook fans

M.Donovan says:
Jan-31-2013 11:32 am

I know what you mean, but we
I know what you mean, but we can not change the situation! scam

M.Donovan says:
Jan-31-2013 11:32 am

I know what you mean, but we can not change the situation! scam

M.Mirevski says:
Jan-29-2013 02:23 pm

It also comes in handy for
It also comes in handy for baking recipes like cornbread or smaller cakes.I know many recipes call for round slices.Easy chicken casserole http://yummycasseroles.com/easy-chicken-casserole/ In the United States, casserole cooking became very popular in the 1950's as a way to prepare a nutritious meal in one dish, and relieve women of kitchen drudgery.Refrigerate and let set for 1 hour (preferably overnight).

M.Mirevski says:
Jan-29-2013 02:23 pm

It also comes in handy for baking recipes like cornbread or smaller cakes.I know many recipes call for round slices.Easy chicken casserole http://yummycasseroles.com/easy-chicken-casserole/ In the United States, casserole cooking became very popular in the 1950's as a way to prepare a nutritious meal in one dish, and relieve women of kitchen drudgery.Refrigerate and let set for 1 hour (preferably overnight).

gild123 says:
Jan-19-2013 10:59 am

RE
The Oracle Database 11g Data Warehousing Implementation Specialist Certification identifies professionals that are skilled in implementing solutions based using the Oracle Database as a data warehouse. Oracle Certification exams, 1Z0-215, 1Z0-216, 1Z0-218, 1Z0-219

gild123 says:
Jan-19-2013 10:59 am

The Oracle Database 11g Data Warehousing Implementation Specialist Certification identifies professionals that are skilled in implementing solutions based using the Oracle Database as a data warehouse. Oracle Certification exams, 1Z0-215, 1Z0-216, 1Z0-218, 1Z0-219

Y.Hendriyanto says:
Dec-27-2012 04:40 pm

Commonwealth Life Perusahaan Asuransi Jiwa Terbaik Indonesia

Commonwealth Life Perusahaan Asuransi Jiwa Terbaik Indonesia

Y.Hendriyanto says:
Dec-27-2012 04:40 pm

Commonwealth Life Perusahaan Asuransi Jiwa Terbaik Indonesia

Polls

Consumer confidence is high. Is that reflected in your stores’ revenues?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...