News

The Rougher Side of Sears

BY Jeff Green

Perhaps no single brand had a holiday season quite as rocky as Sears. When the retailer announced a string of bad news on Jan. 9, shares of Sears Holding Corp. (which includes both Sears and Kmart) went through the floor. Holiday sales at Sears stores were down 9.2% in the nine weeks prior to Jan. 6, a brutal figure when you consider that overall retail sales were up slightly over the holidays (which I’ll discuss more in my next column).

As we know, it’s not as if this is a blip on the radar screen: Sears Holding Corp. reported an adjusted loss of somewhere between $811 million and $914 million in 2013, and Sears (and, to a lesser extent, Kmart — which was, by the way, down 5.7% itself over the holidays) has been seeing declining sales ever since the Sears-Kmart merger in 2005.

Considering the fact that Sears and Kmart have been struggling for some time now, I think it’s noteworthy that these numbers are so bad that they did more than raise eyebrows — they made headlines. To me, the overall trajectory of the brand is so negative that it might be time to start asking hard questions, such as whether or not vendors will continue to work with Sears if the disappointments continue.

How did it come to this? While there are a lot of moving parts that contribute to the success or failure of any retail brand, one piece that jumps out at me with Sears and Kmart is that the company has been run less like a true retail operation and more like a real estate owner and developer for years now. What I mean by that is, because they own many of their locations, the value in the brand is largely in the real estate itself. Because of that, they can continue to sell off assets and not only maintain some cash flow, but actually make some money doing it. They have been doing some downsizing, leasing out some space to different retailers and selling some properties — focusing on the value of the real estate instead of the consumer value of the brand. I think it’s worth wondering if this real estate investor mindset and the market challenges don’t disincentivize them from being a good retailer. It’s clear that both the Sears and Kmart brands have suffered mightily. Another question (perhaps the question, with regard to the future of Sears) is this: how long can they continue selling off and repositioning assets? Won’t they, at some point, run out of real estate?

From a retail perspective, things look pretty gloomy. In contrast, for all of J.C. Penney’s much-discussed inconsistency in the last year, it has been obvious that the retail brand is working hard to reinvent and reinvigorate itself. I don’t see nearly as much evidence that Sears and Kmart are investing that kind of energy or resources in similar efforts. The consumer experience at both of those brands remains uninspiring. Kmart has made efforts to bring in new brands and promote mobile shopping, but it remains a distant third in its category. Sears has done even less when it comes to differentiating themselves from the competition, with predictably negative results.

In an environment where the brick-and-mortar experience has got to be good to compete with online sales and to remain competitive in a rapidly evolving marketplace, the frankly glum Sears consumer experience might be the last straw. Sears’ only real remaining strength — tools and appliances — can just as easily be purchased from a Home Depot, Lowes or, in the case of appliances, a consumer electronics store.

If the Sears struggles continue and the brand continues to sell off or reposition assets, what does it mean for retail real estate? I believe the broader real estate market will continue to absorb the added square footage coming on to the market without any real price fluctuations. These are, generally speaking, high-quality and fairly desirable sites, and, since commercial real estate prices held even in the midst of the recession, I doubt even a Sear/Kmart catastrophe would make much of a dent. I do think it’s clear that, to avoid that catastrophe, Sears needs to do some serious thinking about how viable their retail model is going forward — if they have any chance of surviving in the long run, they need to start to focus on operating as a viable retailer again.

That’s my take on this tough situation — what’s your prognosis? And, if you were the doctor and Sears was the patient, what would your prescription be? Is there any chance of a full recovery or is the outlook as grim as it looks? Leave a comment below to continue the conversation, or email me at [email protected].


Click here for past columns by Jeff Green.

keyboard_arrow_downCOMMENTS

Leave a Reply

No comments found

TRENDING STORIES

Polls

Are you hiring seasonal employees this year?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
News

Report: Cross-border Canadian shoppers possibly hit by Target breach

BY Dan Berthiaume

Minneapolis – Target Corp. notified Canadian shoppers who visited U.S, Target stores between Nov. 27 and Dec. 15, 2013 that some of their personal data may have been compromised in the major data breach that hit the retailer. According to the Canadian Press, that information includes personal data such as names, addresses, emails and phone numbers, but not financial data.

An email sent from Target president and CEO Gregg Steinhafel was sent to customers Target thinks may have been affected by the hacking attack. The email says that Target Canada stores were not affected by the breach. A Target spokesperson said less than 1% of all victims, or less than 700,000 consumers, were customers from Canada.

keyboard_arrow_downCOMMENTS

Leave a Reply

No comments found

TRENDING STORIES

Polls

Are you hiring seasonal employees this year?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
News

Eminence Capital nominates two Jos. A. Bank board members

BY Dan Berthiaume

New York — Eminence Capital, which owns 4.9% of the common stock of Jos. A. Bank Clothiers and has been pushing for a deal between the retailer and rival Men’s Wearhouse, has nominated two industry veterans for election as directors to the board at Jos. A. Bank’s annual meeting. The nominees include: Bruce J. Klatsky, former chairman of Phillips-Van Heusen Corporation, a position he held from 1994 until June 2007, and Norman S. Matthews, former president of Federated Department Stores and active and former board member of other retail and consumer companies.

"We are very pleased that these two highly experienced retail executives have agreed to stand for election as independent directors at the 2014 meeting of Jos. A. Bank shareholders,” said Ricky C. Sandler, CEO of Eminence Capital. “Their knowledge and success in the retail industry as well as their commitment to maximizing shareholder value have been clearly evident throughout their long and distinguished careers.”

keyboard_arrow_downCOMMENTS

Leave a Reply

No comments found

TRENDING STORIES

Polls

Are you hiring seasonal employees this year?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...